Harvesting Crop Residue:
What is it worth?
Dollar Value of Crop Residue
The plant residue left in
the field after harvest is a valuable resource. Increasing demand for harvested
crop residue has left many producers wondering whether they should bale and sell
their crop residue or leave it in the field. To help make that decision
producers should consider the following:
Cost of harvesting the residue
Based on the custom baling
price of $11.80 per large round bale, the cost of harvesting residues can range
from $60-70/acre depending on how many bales there are per acre. If the average
bale weighs 1,200 lbs., that works outs to about $20/ton.
Value of removed nutrients
Based on data from the Agricultural Research Service’s (ARS) National Soil
Tilth Lab, a ton of corn residue contains bout 37 lbs. of nitrogen (N), 3.5 lbs.
of phosphorous (P2O5), 33 lbs. of potassium (K2O). Based on fertilizer prices
from the fall of 2008, the estimated cost of nutrients removed would be about
$46/ton (see table). If you remove 3-4 tons of residue per acre (5-6 round
bales) the value of the nutrients removed would be $138 to $185 per acre.
Fertilizer Value of Nutrients in One Ton of Corn Residue*
| Element |
Concentration in residue (%) |
Pound per ton |
Fertilizer nutrient price (.lb)** |
Value of nutrients in residue ($/ton) |
| a |
b |
c = (b/100) x 2,000 |
d |
e = c x d |
| N |
1.85 |
37 |
55 |
$20.35 |
| P2O5 |
.175 |
3.5 |
1.06 |
$3.71 |
| K2O |
1.65 |
33 |
.67 |
$22.11 |
| Total Value |
|
|
|
$46.17 |
*Based on Table 1 from Al-Kasi, et al, 2008. The Effect of Residue Management on
Soil and Water Quality.
**Based on October 2008 fertilizer prices. Substitute current prices in column d
and multiply by column c to get value of each nutrient per ton of corn residue.
Erosion Control
The
value of maintaining crop residue on the soil surface to control soil erosion is
well documented. all the NRCS conservation plans for highly erodible land (HEL)
require that a minimum amount of crop residue be present to control soil
erosion. The amount of residue required varies depending on soil type, crop
rotation, tillage system and existing conservation practices. Producers with HEL
fields should contact their local NRCS office to review their conservation plan
and discuss the potential impact of harvesting crop residue before they remove
any from the field.
Soil Organic
Matter/Soil Health
Perhaps
the most important factor to consider before harvesting crop residue is the
impact on soil organic matter. Soil organic matter contributes directly to the
nutrient availability, nutrient holding capacity, and water holding capacity of
a soil. It also plays a significant role in the formation of water stable
aggregates in the soil which affects infiltration, aeration and drainage.
Soil
organic matter also plays a significant role in soil health as it provides
carbon an energy for soil microorganisms are essential for nutrient cycling in
the soil and some form mutually beneficial relationship with plant roots
providing nutrients to the plants in exchange for energy in the form of simple
sugars.
Removing
crop residue in excess of what the soil can tolerate will ultimately result in
the deterioration of the soil resource and declining yield. Research by the
USDA-Agricultural Research Service at the University of Nebraska Agricultural
Research and Development Center found an average yield decrease of 6% over five
years for continuous no-till corn when an average of 50% of the crop residue was
removed each year (Varvel et al, 2008). While the nutrients removed can be
replaced, the functions of soil organic matter are not so easily mitigated.
Ways to
Reduce the Impact of Residue Removal
Producers who do decide to harvest crop residue have several
options to reduce or minimize the impact of crop residue removal.
1. Reduce or eliminate tillage
operations
Tillage operations could bury much of the remaining crop
residue and increase the rate of residue decomposition adding to the negative
effects of crop residue removal. Switching to a no-till system would reduce the
negative impacts of crop residue removal.
2. Reduce the number of years low residue crops are grown in the crop
rotation
The negative
impact of harvesting crop residue is greater if the rotation includes low
residue crops such as soybeans. Switching from a corn-soybean rotation to a
continuous corn, corn-corn-soybean or corn-soybean wheat rotation would somewhat
offset the negative impact of removing crop residue.
3. Consider growing a cover crop
Establishing a cover crop prior to harvest or immediately
after harvesting crop residue would minimize the negative impacts of crop
residue removal. Cover crops protect the soil surface, enhance soil biology,
capture remaining nutrients and, if legumes are included, add nitrogen back into
the system.
4. Consider adding
manure
Manure will not only replace some of the nutrients that were
removed with the crop residue but will also add some organic matter back into
the system. Manure alone would not be adequate for soil erosion control on HEL
fields because it would not provide enough cover to protect the soil. Manure
would work best in combination with a cover crop.
References
Mahdi Al-Kaisi, Associate Professor, Iowa State University, The Effect of Reside
Management of Soil and Water Quality.
Douglas Karlen. 2008. Agricultural Research Center National Soil Tilth Lab,
Ames, Iowa. GSA-SSSA 2008 Presentation Alabama Energy Summit, Sept. 17, 2008.
<Back to Iowa NRCS Publications
|